Saturday, May 6, 2017

History Books

(This is a missive I sent to my brother who is a professional firearms trainer.  http://www.immediateactionconcepts.com/ )














Here are a few books I highly recommend you read.  They’ll give you some historical perspective and maybe a different way to look at a few things.  I see so many “new” things in the firearms world that simply demonstrate a lack of historical knowledge.    


When I compare martial arts, I look for the differences but I also look for the similarities.  When you see a common thread running through all the martial arts, you may have come across a very basic and important principle.  I think this is especially important when comparing the different martial firearms philosophies and techniques.  You have so many people trying to differentiate themselves from everyone else that you wind up with a lot of flourishes being added or changes being made to no real improvement. 


“No Second Place Winner” by Bill Jordan is what I consider the bible when it comes to point shooting.  The man was in a number of gunfights and witnessed many more.  You may not agree with his technique but you’d do well to learn from his experience. 


“Fast and Fancy Revolver Shooting” by Ed McGivern is a fascinating study in developing speed and accuracy with a handgun.  It is, however, an extraordinarily dry read as McGivern was trying to copy the writing style found in the textbooks of the era.  Still, I think you’ll find a great deal of useful information; much of which is being re-discovered by a lot of trainers, today. 


“Shooting” by J. Henry Fitzgerald is similar to McGivern’s book but much easier to read.  Fitzgerald covered a lot more of the martial applications of handguns.  You’ll notice that Fitzgerald addressed virtually all of the problems encountered in a gunfight. 


You may be familiar with Chuck Taylor’s book, already.  Taylor is another person with tons of experience both in the military and police.  It’s good to look at his observations and the rationale behind the techniques that he developed and taught.    

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Jargon and Shooting


From time to time I am asked by someone to teach him or her how to shoot or handle firearms. I have had formal training in firearms instruction and taught a great many beginners how to shoot safely. One tool I've found useful is YouTube. There are a number of excellent videos (and many more stinkers) on handling and shooting firearms that I can simply send to folks to give them a basic understanding before we actually go hands-on. I also prefer to do some hands-on training before we ever go to the range with live ammo.

Something that I've begun to find bothersome is the slang/jargon/lingo/terminology that is cropping up in a lot of the new videos.  I’ve been active in the shooting sports for almost half a century.  More importantly, I’m interested in the history and theory of firearms and shooting and actively seek out information.  My collection of books and magazines is extensive.  In addition, and perhaps more importantly, I have years of personal experience in almost all aspects of shooting.  Many of these videos include terminology that I’m not familiar with and worse, this new terminology is replacing terms that have been in use for a hundred years or more. 

 There are several reasons for the new slang.  The first and only legitimate use is to describe something new.  If there is a genuinely new piece of equipment, or technique, or understanding of a process, then a new term is required.  Unfortunately, there are a lot fewer new things in the world of firearms than the youngsters would like to admit. 

The other reasons for new terminology are less acceptable and more frequent. 

Simple ignorance can breed a new word or phrase.  One of the advantages of books is that they can pre-date the Internet.  It’s hard for the current generation to understand how recent and ephemeral the information they find on the Internet really is.  Online info also spreads very quickly so the youngsters hear the other youngsters using the same verbiage (and in some cases mispronunciations) and assume it’s correct.  A lack of knowledge of history forces reinvention.  I would personally rather build on the knowledge of my predecessors instead of having to rediscover everything myself. 

Marketing is another reason for the new jargon.  All the new tactical trainers have a monetary interest in gathering students.  Since the current generation grew up with rapidly changing technology “new is better” has become an accepted (although potentially inaccurate) catchphrase.  It’s hard to stand out from your competition if you teach essentially the same curriculum.  One way to stand out is to teach something “new” and different.  Since there is remarkably little “new” in the shooting world, making up new terminology for old concepts is one way to differentiate yourself from your competition.  To be fair, some of these guys are genuinely ignorant of what came before so are, in all innocence, reinventing the wheel.      

Another and more disturbing reason for new terminology is exclusion.  There’s a tendency for humans to want to belong to groups.  People want to believe they’re special and belonging to an exclusive group makes them feel special.  This often leads to wanting to keep others out of the group.  A secret language or inside joke is one way to exclude others.  If we’d like the shooting sports to grow, we have to be inclusive of others.  By intimidating new shooters, we limit the interest, growth, and support of firearms and shooting. 

The whole point of communication is to make ourselves understood.  The correct and consistent use of terminology is important to clear communication.  If we insist on rapidly changing or misusing the language, we defeat the entire purpose. 

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Pistol Advice for Mike


Pistol Advice for Mike     

First, caliber is both important and unimportant.  I need a bullet that will do the job but there are any number of cartridges that will take care of business.  I can defend myself with a 9 mm, .40, 10 mm, .357 SIG, .45 ACP, or just about anything that goes bang.  I would personally stick with 9 mm or .45 simply because ammunition is more available than some of the less common calibers.  Select a good bullet that will give you the penetration you need.  Test the ammo you select in your pistol for reliability.  Don’t expect the same sort of performance out of a .25 as you would a 9.  Also, even though a .500 will do the job, follow up shots will be more difficult and weight can get out of hand.  My personal preference is for a .45 ACP with a controlled expansion hollowpoint or full metal jacket flat point in 200 to 230 grains. 

Don’t get too caught up with accuracy.  Accuracy is actually at the bottom of my desirable attributes in a defensive pistol- reliability is the most important.  Remember that virtually all defensive shootings occur at conversational distances (“Gimme yer wallet!”) with most occurring at contact range.  Yes, you are most likely to start shooting when your opponent actually has his hands on you.  Many years ago, Col. Jeff Cooper stated that virtually all modern, quality handguns were capable of shooting golf-ball size groups at typical defensive ranges.  Clint Smith states that, if you can keep all your shots on a paper plate at 15 yards under all conditions, you have sufficient accuracy to save your life.  I don’t mind as much accuracy as I can get but I won’t give up reliability and I don’t see an advantage to carrying a pistol that will shoot one-inch groups at 50 meters when I can’t shoot one inch groups at 50 meters under field conditions.  If you and your pistol can hold one inch per ten meters under stress and field conditions, that’s really all you need out of a handgun. 

Don’t spend so much time agonizing over which pistol to get that you end up without.  I can work with just about anything.  I have my preferences but I’ve been issued or had to settle for something else on more than one occasion.  I will understand the limitations of whatever I get and work to maximize my ability with whatever I’m carrying.   

I would advise you to get a nice used Glock or Springfield XD in 9 mm, .40, or .45.  Police trade-ins can be a good deal.  Otherwise, there are several inexpensive but solid imports like Taurus or Canik.  You can find something inexpensive you can work with until you decide what you really want.  It doesn’t hurt to have more than one pistol. 

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Information for the New AR Owner


Here are some of my favorite training videos for new AR owners. 

How to clean it Air Force style. 


How to shoot it Marine Corps style. 


This is a good intro on exterior ballistics and where to zero your AR.  I like a 200 meter zero for most optics. 


This is a surprisingly good intro on operating the AR. 


Clint Smith is my favorite instructor.  I agree with almost everything he teaches.  Here’s an intro to his urban rifle course. 

Part one is the classroom portion.  Please don’t skip it.  There’s a lot of solid information in it. 


Part two is the range portion. 


Dave Spaulding is another excellent instructor. 


Here is a video on accessorizing your AR.  When it comes to accessories, I believe that less is more.  I like a good set of iron sights, a practical optic, a two point sling, and a white light.  I don’t care for the vertical foregrips and prefer a nice set of rail covers so it doesn’t feel like I’m trying to hang onto a wood rasp. 

Saturday, April 2, 2016

Handgun Barrel Length


Handgun Barrel Length 

Barrel length is one of the variables you will have to choose when purchasing a handgun.  In many cases, the determining factor will simply be what you prefer.  However, there are some very real differences that translate to advantages and disadvantages between barrel lengths.  I will go over those differences and tell you my preferences and reasoning. 

Please note, the way you measure the barrel length on revolving pistols (revolvers) and autoloading pistols is different.  When you measure the barrel on a revolver, you do not include the chamber.  This means that a four inch barrel on a revolver is equivalent to a five inch barrel on an auto. 

Longer barrels give you higher velocities.  This may be important for hunting or long-range target shooting.  The general rule is 15 to 30 feet per second per inch of barrel length.  The reason is the longer the barrel the more powder can burn before the bullet exits the firearm.  Remember that when you are comparing calibers from a ballistics table.  Many of the published velocities for magnum cartridges are obtained from six or even eight inch barrels.  If you are shooting a two inch barrel .357 magnum, you are not going to get the same velocities and might be served just as well shooting .38 specials out of the same pistol for less muzzle blast. 

Longer barrels have less muzzle blast and flash.  Muzzle blast is caused by unburned powder.  Getting a more complete burn reduces the noise and flash.  Reduced muzzle flash can be important if you have to shoot your handgun in the dark.  The majority of defensive shootings occur in low light and too much muzzle flash can blind you temporarily.    

Longer barrels can allow for a longer sight radius.  In general, the longer the sight radius, the easier it is to see variations in your sight alignment.  A longer sight radius makes it easier to achieve subjective accuracy.  Accuracy is important for target shooting and hunting but is less so for defensive shooting.  Virtually all defensive handgun shooting occurs at conversational distances (“Gimme yer wallet!”) with most occurring at contact ranges.  While I like getting the most accuracy I can, it’s a tertiary concern- behind reliability and power- in a defensive handgun. 

Longer barrels cut down on felt recoil.  The added weight and leverage gained by a longer barrel reduce muzzle rise. 

Shorter barrels have several advantages.  They make the pistol shorter and lighter and, to a certain extent, more concealable.  A shorter barrel also makes the pistol easier to draw quickly.  When a barrel gets beyond a certain length, it restricts the type of holsters and carry positions you can use. 

Shorter barrels also have some disadvantages.  Disadvantages include reduced velocity, reduced sight radius (not important if you use a micro-red dot), increased muzzle blast (which can be mitigated by tailoring your ammunition to your weapon), and, in autoloaders, decreased reliability.  That last disadvantage is the most concerning. 

I’ll use the 1911 as an example but the mechanics apply across most designs.  The 1911 was designed with a 5 inch barrel and a 16 pound recoil spring. 

The 5 inch barrel gives the maximum reliability in the 1911.  If we reduce the barrel length, we also reduce the distance the slide can move when it ejects the fired case and loads the new cartridge.  The pistol will become less tolerant of variations in bullet profile and cartridge length. 

You also have to get the same amount of work done in less space which means the recoil spring has to be stronger.  The standard spring rate in a 4 inch barrel 1911 goes up to 18 pounds and it increases to 20 pounds with a three inch barrel.  Increasing the recoil spring rate makes the pistol less tolerant of variations in ammunition recoil and the 1911 is a recoil operated mechanism.  Heavier recoil springs also make the pistol more sensitive to limp-wristing.  Limp-wristing is just what it sounds like, you fire the pistol with a limp wrist.  This can induce malfunctions because the shooter is not providing enough resistance for the spring to work against.    

Finally, the 1911 is a tipping barrel design.  The shorter barrels end up at more extreme angles than longer barrels when the slide is in its rearmost position.  Again, this increases the sensitivity to bullet profile and cartridge overall length.  Most modern auto pistols use a cam design rather than the swinging link of the 1911 which makes the barrel tipping less of an issue but it can still cause problems in the subcompacts.  There are a couple of designs that use a rotating barrel or other locking system that don’t have this particular concern. 

You can tailor your ammunition to suit your pistol and reduce some of the problems caused by a too-short barrel.  Regardless of what handgun you use, you should test the ammunition you intend to carry for compatibility and reliability in your pistol.  Testing two to five hundred rounds of your intended carry ammo is not unreasonable for a defensive firearm.  Ammunition using faster powders can help reduce muzzle blast in a short barrel. 

So, for a carry weapon, the idea is to choose a barrel length that gives a good balance between the advantages and disadvantages for your given situation. 

For dedicated target or hunting handguns I prefer a six to eight inch barrel.  With barrels that long, I use a crossdraw holster.  I find anything longer than eight inches to be unwieldy regardless of my intended use.  Examples include my old bullseye target pistol which is a Ruger .22 long rifle with a six and seven-eighths inch barrel and a Ruger Bisley .44 magnum with a 7 ½ inch barrel.  The long barrel in the .44 magnum reduces muzzle blast and recoil considerably.    

One of the few advantages of a handgun over a long gun is portability.  You have to carry a rifle but you wear a handgun.  If I’m working in bear country, a slung rifle can get in the way but a holstered pistol can go almost unnoticed all day.  My everyday carry gun when I’m boondocking in areas with large animals is a four inch barrel Smith and Wesson .44 magnum.  With that barrel length I get the velocity and subjective accuracy I need without making the pistol heavy and unwieldy.  The recoil is unpleasant but not unmanageable.  I carry the pistol in a strong side belt holster or horizontal shoulder holster. 

I have several pistols that I have carried for self-defense.  I don’t like a barrel shorter than four inches in an autoloader or three inches in a revolver.  I don’t mind carrying a full-sized five inch barrel 1911.  I find the bulk in the grips and action is more of a concern for concealment than the barrel length.  I usually use an inside the waistband (IWB) belt holster that keeps most of the pistol out of sight.  I prefer the four inch barrel on the autos to reduce weight rather than size.  I carry a five inch barrel 1911 .45 ACP in a strong side IWB or horizontal shoulder holster.  I carry a Taurus 24/7 .45 ACP with a four inch barrel in a strong side IWB.  I use lighter bullets with faster powder in the Taurus to cut down on muzzle flash and recoil.  Please note, one of the reasons I prefer the .45 ACP is that it is a low pressure round with minimal muzzle flash to begin with.  Sometimes I will carry a 2 ½ inch barrel Smith and Wesson model 19 .357 magnum in a strong side, high-ride, outside the waistband holster.  I use +P .38 specials rather than magnum ammo to cut down on the recoil and muzzle blast without giving up much velocity in that short barrel.  I jokingly say that I carry the .38 when I don’t feel the need to go armed.    

    

Monday, October 14, 2013

Maritza's Birthday 1911


Maritza’s Birthday 1911 

Mari enjoyed shooting one of my .45 ACP 1911 pistols and wanted one of her own.  I decided to get her one for her birthday.  Unfortunately, we are coming out of a firearms shortage caused by fear mongering, profiteering, and hoarding.  Pistols of the 1911 design from most of the major manufacturers were difficult to find and generally overpriced. 

The Philippine manufactured 1911s were both inexpensive and widely available.  In the past, I have been less than impressed with the firearms coming from the Philippines; quality control and metallurgy tended to be poor.  Before I bought one, I did considerable research and handled a number of the currently available pistols.  The Philippine manufacturers have modernized their manufacturing methods and tightened their quality control considerably.  As a matter of fact, they are turning out pistols and parts for a number of other well-known brand names.  The examples I handled showed quite good fit and finish.  The reviews I found online indicated a few minor problems (primarily with spring longevity) but nothing I couldn’t repair or replace myself. 

I decided to take a chance and ordered a Citadel 1911A1 imported by Legacy Sports.  I ordered through Davidson’s Guns as they offer a lifetime warranty on firearms purchased from them. 

Per Mari’s stated preference, I ordered a full-sized pistol with a 5” barrel and checkered wooden stocks.  The finish is a black phosphate similar to Parkerizing.  The pistol came with a lockable hard case and two eight-round magazines. 

Mari’s Citadel is quite similar to the Loaded model offered by Springfield Armory with a number of modifications added to the original 1911A1 platform.  It has a beavertail grip safety with a memory bump (which I like), a skeletonized hammer and medium length trigger, chamfered magazine well, flat plastic checkered mainspring housing (which I don’t like), front slide serrations, and an ambidextrous safety (which I also don’t like).  I’m perfectly willing and able to change out any parts that Mari doesn’t like for something that suits her better. 

The sights are a nice copy of the Novak low profile fixed sights.  They offer an excellent sight picture but they are black on black.  I personally prefer a three dot system.  Whatever Mari decides to go with is easily accomplished with a bit of paint.  The sights aren’t true Novaks and the dovetails will require some modification to fit another set of sights, if necessary. 

I detail stripped the pistol and cleaned off all the preservative shipping oil.  That oil is designed for rust prevention and not lubrication and often acts more like glue.  I think much of the talk of “breaking in” these Philippine 1911s is simply the new owners failing to lubricate them properly.   

I inspected all the parts and everything seemed to be in spec and well made.  I understand there is some concern over the metal injection molded (MIM) parts, but if they’re well executed, they should serve.  I can easily replace any small parts or springs that don’t seem to be holding up.  I lubricated everything with Ballistol and hit the high-wear points with some moly grease.  I then reassembled the pistol and worked the action to smooth out some of the finish.  I function checked it but did not test fire it as I felt that Maritza should be the first one to fire her new pistol. 

Maritza was quite pleased with her birthday gift but we didn’t get a chance to go out and shoot it for several days.  We went out early Sunday morning to try and beat the worsening winds.  My regular target holders are buried in storage so I used a large cardboard box.  A chunk of wood in the bottom served to keep our impromptu target holder from heading for the New Mexico border. 

I had Mari load one magazine with a single round and her second magazine with three rounds.  With a new semi-auto it assures that, if the disconnector is not working correctly, you won’t empty a magazine on uncontrolled full-auto.  The first round was on the paper at about 15 yards.  The pistol cycled flawlessly with the 230 grain FMJ round nose we were able to find.  Empties were being ejected very consistently about five feet out and in the same area. 

Maritza had me fire a few rounds and I was able to keep all the shots within a couple of inches at 15 yards; which isn’t bad for offhand in high winds.  It’s hitting a little low for Mari but the sights are spot on for me.  Overall we’re both well pleased with the pistol. 

Maritza’s gunhandling and accuracy is improving with each training session.  Her loading and unloading of the pistol is getting smoother and smoother and her recoil control is excellent for someone who hasn’t fired more than three full boxes of ammo through a .45 yet.  Much of the gunhandling and accuracy skills can be developed without firing the pistol so Mari will be able to improve her skills even if we can’t get to the range frequently. 

Unfortunately Mari found out that shooting, while fun to the point of addiction, can be expensive.  The one box of factory ammo she bought didn’t last long.  Reloading and airsoft will allow more shooting with less expense. 

I wrote the following as part of a birthday letter I included with her present: 

“Now comes the fun part.  Guns are a lot like children- they end up costing you a lot of money.  You’ll want to buy ammunition, cleaning supplies, safety equipment, different parts, holster and magazine pouch, spare magazines, targets. . . the list is endless.  I haven’t given you a pistol.  I’ve given you a money pit.  But still, I hope you enjoy it.” 

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Mari's Handloads



I took Mari out shooting my Ruger Bisley .44 magnum.  She really enjoyed it and wants a .44 of her own.  The Bisley grip is a bit large for her hands so she is looking at the Super Blackhawk with the 5 ½ inch barrel.  The 4 5/8 inch and 5 ½ inch Super Blackhawks have smaller grips than the Bisley or the longer barreled Super Blackhawks.  In fact, the grips on the 4 5/8 inch and 5 ½ inch barreled revolvers are the same size as the standard Blackhawks.  While the smaller grips make trigger reach easier, they do increase felt recoil and muzzle rise over the Bisley.  Since I own a 4 5/8 inch Super Blackhawk, we took that out shooting so Mari could get an idea of what the recoil will be like with the smaller grip. 

We burned up all my odd .44 magnum reloads the last time we went out shooting.  Mari was interested in reloading so I let her load up 50 rounds for our next range session.  I talked her through it but Mari did all the work. 

She started with some Winchester Western brass I had.  She took it from the tumbler and resized and decapped it with a Lee carbide die in a Lyman single stage press.  Next, she checked the overall length.  This brass has been reloaded a few times and may need trimming the next time but was still just below the maximum overall length.  Upon inspection we found no neck cracks and the primer pockets are still tight.  She continued with the brass prep by scraping out the primer pockets with an old Herter’s primer pocket cleaner I picked up many years ago. 

For powder I had some Hodgdon Universal Clays I wanted to use up.  I picked up a pound to use in a 2 inch barrel .38 special revolver.  It wasn’t compatible with the Ranier plated bullets I wanted to use as they wouldn’t take a heavy crimp and Universal needs a lot of bullet pull to get a good burn.  In the .38 I couldn’t get any velocity to speak of and the powder wasn’t burning clean.  I decided to try it with moderate loads in the .44 with some different bullets just to get rid of it. 

For bullets I had some 250 grain Keith style cast bullets.  They were cast with an LBT mold out of straight wheelweight alloy.  I hadn’t heat treated this batch of bullets as they were for moderate loads.  The large crimp groove on the Keith bullets would allow a heavy crimp and I was hoping the Universal would work with them.  Mari lubed the bullets with Javelina 50/50 beeswax Alox and sized them to .430 with a Lee push through sizer.  .430 inches provides a tight slip fit in the chamber throats on this revolver and has given good accuracy with other loads in it.  I’ve always gotten good accuracy with the Keith bullets in all my revolvers with light, moderate or heavy loads. 

Since I’ve not used Universal in the .44 before, I chose a starting load from the data to get a base velocity and see how the powder would perform in this pistol with these components.  Hodgdon’s data gives a velocity of 850 feet per second out of an 8 1/8” barrel.  Out of a 4 5/8” barrel, I expected to get about 100 FPS less.  I like to use an old Lee Safety powder measure for my moderate handgun loads as it’s easy to set up and can’t get out of adjustment.  One of the cavities threw a charge just .2 grains above the suggested starting load but still well below the maximum so I set the measure with that cavity. 

Mari primed the cases with CCI 300 standard large pistol primers.  I had a bunch of the CCI primers on hand.  I don’t care for magnum primers unless I’m shooting a powder that’s hard to ignite like H110.  Magnum primers raise pressures and I’d rather get my pressure from the powder as I think I get slightly more consistent velocities.  She used a Lee hand primer to prime the cases.  I like the Lee as it gives me a better feel than a press mounted primer. 

Mari flared the case mouths until they’d just clear the bullet bases.  I try not to work the brass any more than necessary to get longer case life.  This batch of Winchester cases has been reloaded several times and I still see no signs of case mouth cracks. 

After checking the powder charge on a scale, Mari charged all the cases with powder.  She checked the powder levels visually to catch any double charges.  We also pulled several cases and weighed the powder to make sure the loads were consistent.  The Lee Safety measure can’t get out of adjustment but powder can settle and start throwing heavier charges.  We kept the measure more than half full and tapped it down so the charge weights were consistent from start to finish.  The Universal works well in this measure. 

Next, Mari seated the bullets.  The cartridge overall length is determined by the crimp groove location with the Keith bullets.  The deep crimp groove allowed for a fairly heavy crimp so I was confident we’d get a good burn with the Universal. 

We got out to the range early to beat the heat, wind and crowds.  Mari was the first one to shoot her reloads.  The revolver is sighted in for my eyes so it was hitting a bit high for Mari but she was getting decent groups.  At about 20 yards we got a three shot group right at an inch and about two inches above the aiming point from the offhand position. 

I fired a couple of rounds over the chronograph before the battery died.  The velocity was averaging 750 FPS which is about where I was expecting.  Recoil and muzzle blast were quite comfortable with this load. 

We backed off to 50 yards and Mari was keeping most of her shots on the paper but was still hitting high.  I think we were getting some glare off the front sight and should probably throw a little sight black on it.  We couldn’t do any real long range shooting as there were cattle in the area but did get to shoot at a stump about 100 yards away.  We burned up the rest of the ammo plinking at various objects left by previous shooters. 

The day was a success.  Mari got a feel for the smaller grip on the Ruger and got in some practice with her handloads.  The load was accurate and we obviously have some room to bump up the load if we decide to.  Now, all I have to do is cast up some more of those Keith bullets.